Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 18, 2011 at 22:48 vote accept mna
Feb 18, 2011 at 17:02 comment added mna You have convinced me thanks! Now taking a side-step, is there a simpler function than my f(t,L)?
Feb 18, 2011 at 16:31 comment added Tom De Medts Yes, the argument is always correct. For each digit, the possible outcomes are 0,1,...,9, so the generating function for each digit is $1 + x + x^2 + \dots + x^9$. Since you are asking for the number of possible strings consisting of $L$ digits and summing up to a given number $t$, the answer is precisely the coefficient of $x^t$ in the product of these $L$ generating functions.
Feb 18, 2011 at 16:12 comment added mna I am willing to believe you, but does your argument still hold after examining past the first 10 numbers in the sequence, when the summation starts to be used? I added a latex that I think is the closed form.
Feb 18, 2011 at 10:45 history answered Tom De Medts CC BY-SA 2.5