Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 18, 2011 at 15:47 answer added Bruce Westbury timeline score: 1
Feb 18, 2011 at 4:34 vote accept Mikhail Gudim
Feb 18, 2011 at 4:34 vote accept Mikhail Gudim
Feb 18, 2011 at 4:34
Feb 18, 2011 at 4:34 vote accept Mikhail Gudim
Feb 18, 2011 at 4:34
S Feb 18, 2011 at 4:34 vote accept Mikhail Gudim
Feb 18, 2011 at 4:34
Feb 18, 2011 at 4:33 vote accept Mikhail Gudim
S Feb 18, 2011 at 4:34
Feb 18, 2011 at 2:29 comment added Ben Webster Johannes- The OP already said that; it's the same as his argument about reducing to localizations at prime ideal.
Feb 18, 2011 at 1:37 answer added Hailong Dao timeline score: 3
Feb 17, 2011 at 23:07 answer added David E Speyer timeline score: 1
Feb 17, 2011 at 20:56 vote accept Mikhail Gudim
Feb 18, 2011 at 4:33
Feb 17, 2011 at 20:53 comment added Mikhail Gudim @Tortsten Ekedahl: can you please give a reference for the "wild classification problem"
Feb 17, 2011 at 20:18 answer added David Hill timeline score: 3
Feb 17, 2011 at 18:55 comment added Johannes Ebert You can generalize the argument of simultaneous diagonalization to reduce the problem. More precisely, you can split $V$ into a direct sum of invariant pieces, and on each piece each $A_i$ is the sum of a scalar and a nilpotent one. This reduces the problem to the case where all $A_i$ are nilpotent.
Feb 17, 2011 at 18:46 comment added David Hill I don't understand this comment at all.
Feb 17, 2011 at 18:26 comment added Torsten Ekedahl As soon as $n>1$ we get a wild classification problem (in the sense of representation theory) and hence any kind of explicit description is hopeless.
Feb 17, 2011 at 18:11 history edited Mikhail Gudim CC BY-SA 2.5
added 28 characters in body
Feb 17, 2011 at 17:21 history asked Mikhail Gudim CC BY-SA 2.5