Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 3, 2019 at 10:26 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble
Jun 3, 2019 at 8:31 comment added YCor Techniques to prove that a group is f.p. and that a group is not f.p. are quite different. For the second, I'd say that the general idea is to have a good understanding of some "approximating sequence" $(G_n\twoheadrightarrow)$ of truncated presentations. This applies in many examples, e.g. in Bieri-Strebel for infinitely presented metabelian groups, for wreath products, for topological-full groups of minimal self-homeos, lacunary hyperbolic groups, etc. By "good" understanding, I mean we either directly see that $G_n$ is not isomorphic to $G$, or that $G_n\to G_{n+1}$ has nontrivial kernel.
Jun 2, 2019 at 20:53 answer added AGenevois timeline score: 2
Feb 10, 2011 at 4:48 comment added Steve D Maybe this is too basic, but algebraic (ex. nilpotent) and geometric (ex. hyperbolic) properties can give f.p. automatically.
Feb 10, 2011 at 3:33 answer added HJRW timeline score: 17
Feb 10, 2011 at 2:36 answer added user6976 timeline score: 33
Feb 10, 2011 at 2:10 history asked Mauricio CC BY-SA 2.5