Timeline for What is the right definition of "real von Neumann algebra"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2014 at 11:26 | comment | added | Johannes Hahn | Why not use something like "A real X is a complex X together with a fixed choice of a complex conjugation such that the complex X is the complexification of the fixed points under conjugation" | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 10:40 | answer | added | Rashidkhon | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 18:43 | answer | added | Mkouboi | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 17:17 | answer | added | Manny Reyes | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 16:50 | answer | added | Jon Bannon | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 9, 2011 at 16:26 | comment | added | Paul Siegel | I just glanced back at the proof of the statement that a $\ast$-algebra of bounded operators on a complex Hilbert space is closed in the weak topology iff it is closed in the strong topology iff it is the same as its bicommutant, and I don't see any reason why the proof shouldn't work over a real Hilbert space, but I would be grateful to be corrected. | |
| Feb 9, 2011 at 16:20 | history | asked | Paul Siegel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |