Timeline for Is this equivalent to Goldbach's conjecture?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 10, 2011 at 22:27 | comment | added | Asterios Gkantzounis | ...and of course humor | |
| Feb 10, 2011 at 22:15 | comment | added | Asterios Gkantzounis | its a matter of instict, aesthetics...difference...etc. | |
| Feb 10, 2011 at 22:00 | comment | added | David Hansen | What makes you think they are delicious? (I do not mean this facetiously!) | |
| Feb 10, 2011 at 18:54 | comment | added | Asterios Gkantzounis | Sorry,i should have posted it as a soft question, it's like riddles for dinner and of course i think that are people at MO with more brutal computing force than mine as i have seen at many answers. And of course too bad because i had some delicious conjectures-problems to propose :) | |
| Feb 10, 2011 at 18:40 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | MathOverflow is not the correct place to broadcast your conjectures. This is especially true if they are conjectures about prime numbers that you haven't put any effort into either verifying computationally, or checking for good probabilistic behavior. | |
| Feb 10, 2011 at 18:25 | history | edited | Asterios Gkantzounis | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 243 characters in body; added 5 characters in body; Post Made Community Wiki
|
| Feb 10, 2011 at 14:18 | answer | added | user9072 | timeline score: 14 | |
| Feb 10, 2011 at 12:46 | history | undeleted | Kim Morrison | ||
| Feb 8, 2011 at 12:12 | history | deleted | user11564 | ||
| Feb 8, 2011 at 12:11 | history | undeleted | user11564 | ||
| Feb 8, 2011 at 12:11 | history | deleted | user11564 | ||
| Feb 8, 2011 at 11:51 | history | edited | Asterios Gkantzounis | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 209 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2011 at 11:13 | comment | added | Asterios Gkantzounis | yes you are right i was a llitle bit hasty not checking wikipedia before asking this question | |
| Feb 8, 2011 at 11:09 | history | edited | Asterios Gkantzounis | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 306 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2011 at 11:05 | comment | added | user9072 | Maybe I am missing something: what part of your question remains unanswered from the page you linked to? ad 2, page says there is a conjecture saying no you don't need this. ad 1, since that conjecture is around since a while, essentially impossible. ad 3, the page discusses relations to weak/ternary Goldabch, so if there were 'easy' implications with Golbach they would be mentioned too, no? (As far as my limited understanding goes, chances are the problem is similar to Goldbach, in both one has 2 primes to choose opposed to ternaty/weak Goldbach and Chen's theorem were there are 3). | |
| Feb 8, 2011 at 10:55 | history | edited | Asterios Gkantzounis | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 123 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2011 at 10:47 | history | edited | Asterios Gkantzounis | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 167 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2011 at 9:36 | history | edited | Asterios Gkantzounis | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 38 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2011 at 9:30 | history | edited | Asterios Gkantzounis | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2011 at 9:18 | history | asked | Asterios Gkantzounis | CC BY-SA 2.5 |