Timeline for Reference for working with the implicit function theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2019 at 15:28 | vote | accept | David E Speyer | ||
| Nov 12, 2019 at 14:53 | answer | added | Tobias Diez | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 21:29 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | $g$ and $f$ are mixed up in one statement. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 20:39 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | The proof of Sard's theorem is an excellent way to work through several of these reformulations. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 20:37 | answer | added | Julien Puydt | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 17:26 | comment | added | Deane Yang | But isn't it reasonable for the student to struggle with figuring out how to prove these variants? Becoming facile with using the implicit function theorem is for me a rather basic and necessary skill for a differential geometer. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 16:54 | answer | added | lhf | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 16:53 | answer | added | Stefan Waldmann | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 16:43 | history | asked | David E Speyer | CC BY-SA 2.5 |