Skip to main content

Timeline for Is this 1974 claim still valid?

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 5, 2011 at 23:10 vote accept Unknown
Feb 5, 2011 at 12:40 comment added Willie Wong @Elohemahab: not just $y+z$. By the definition of $(a,b)$, Denis's construction admits any linear combination (a 2-parameter family) of the functions $y$ and $z$.
Feb 5, 2011 at 9:23 history edited Unknown CC BY-SA 2.5
added a link to the main book containg quote
Feb 4, 2011 at 21:06 answer added agt timeline score: 12
Feb 4, 2011 at 20:41 answer added Michael Renardy timeline score: 3
Feb 4, 2011 at 20:41 answer added Igor Rivin timeline score: 29
Feb 4, 2011 at 18:11 comment added Unknown @Anthony, the sought-after type is a 2nd order linear ODE which is not one with constant coefficients, or one reducible to such by changes of the independent variable.
Feb 4, 2011 at 17:49 comment added Unknown @Denis, thanks for the edit. Is your $f$ equal to $y+z$?
Feb 4, 2011 at 17:36 comment added Anthony Quas maybe it just depends on what's meant by a type of differential equation?
Feb 4, 2011 at 17:28 comment added Denis Serre I don't understand the claim. Choose two elementary functions $y(t)$ and $z(t)$, functionally independent. Then the system formed by $a(t)y'(t)+b(t)y(t)+y''(t)=0$ and $a(t)z'(t)+b(t)z(t)+z''(t)=0$ admits a unique solution $(a,b)$. Then the linear 2nd-order ODE $f''+af'+bf=0$ is solvable in terms of elementary functions. What is wrong ?
Feb 4, 2011 at 17:24 history edited Denis Serre CC BY-SA 2.5
edited body
Feb 4, 2011 at 17:12 history asked Unknown CC BY-SA 2.5