It will take awhile (for me anyway) to appreciate whether Luca's $M$-machines obstruct the $P$-time uniform reduction of ${BQP}^{P}\,\to\,{BQP}$ that is at the heart of the original question posed here on on MathOverflow, that question being, "Does BQP^P = BQP? ... and what proof machinery is available?""Does BQP^P = BQP? ... and what proof machinery is available?", which in turn generalized a question that was posed by Dick Lipton and Ken Regan on their weblog Gödel's Lost Letter and P=NP, the question "Is Factoring Really In BQP? Really?"
The practical motivation for this question arises from a previous MathOverflow question "Does $BQP^P = BQP$? That is, is $P$ low for $BQP$?Does $BQP^P = BQP$? That is, is $P$ low for $BQP$?" (to which Aram Harrow supplied the answer "yes", accompanied by good references). The present question asks about the computational resources that are required to accomplish this reduction.
Once this runtime estimation question is answered, I will incorporate it into a summary answer for the previous question "Does $BQP^P = BQP$? That is, is $P$ low for $BQP$?Does $BQP^P = BQP$? That is, is $P$ low for $BQP$?" ... along with my thanks to all who answer.