Timeline for Baum-Connes conjecture
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2011 at 12:48 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=6976 by developer User.Id=69903 | |
| Feb 1, 2011 at 4:21 | comment | added | user6976 | @Igor: OK, I just paid my AMS membership fee, and feel like complaining. Similar thing happens on April 15 when I pay my taxes.:) I don't think AMS records invited lectures at AMS meetings. Anyway I will ask Braun and other people who are mentioned here. | |
| Feb 1, 2011 at 1:36 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | @Mark: actually, I am not certain AMS does not do it, but I think that if we started to discuss all the ways in which the AMS is behind the times, that would take us a very long time... | |
| Feb 1, 2011 at 1:20 | comment | added | user6976 | @Igor: OK, then this lecture should have been recorded and saved. It is not difficult. Strange that AMS does not do it. | |
| Feb 1, 2011 at 1:08 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | I don't know about Novikov, but Baum gave a rather detailed 1 hour talk, so it sounded like he was very much in the loop. | |
| Jan 31, 2011 at 22:05 | comment | added | user6976 | I am not sure he is the main "player" (it is like asking S. P. Novikov about the current status of Novikov's conjecture). Perhaps some Penn State students know the answer. There are several of them on MO. | |
| Jan 31, 2011 at 22:00 | history | answered | Igor Rivin | CC BY-SA 2.5 |