Timeline for Theorems for nothing (and the proofs for free) [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
36 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2016 at 5:00 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Oct 16, 2016 at 6:45 | |||||
| Sep 11, 2013 at 13:04 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Sep 11, 2013 at 13:06 | |||||
| May 4, 2011 at 9:01 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | Darij: Vaguely relevant meta threads: tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/210 and tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/459 (If you really want to discuss this, start a thread on meta about it) | |
| May 4, 2011 at 7:06 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Wow Andrew. I am not normally surprised when I see you on the list of closers of a question (and most times it is actually there for a good reason), but I did not expect you to go that far, particularly leaving us the mystery of how your question all of a sudden became no longer relevant. Did you intend to use the theorems-for-nothing list, e. g. a popular talk? If yes, what did you use and how well was it absorbed? But even then, I am not sure whether the question is no longer relevant just because it is not relevant to you... | |
| Oct 9, 2010 at 23:52 | comment | added | I. J. Kennedy | What happened between November and June that rendered this question no longer relevant? | |
| Jun 23, 2010 at 18:32 | history | closed |
Andrew Stacey Harry Gindi S. Carnahan♦ |
no longer relevant | |
| Jun 23, 2010 at 18:06 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | Time to put this one to bed. (ie, time to close it, I deem.) | |
| Feb 23, 2010 at 2:02 | answer | added | max | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 21, 2010 at 4:11 | answer | added | Suresh Venkat | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 21, 2010 at 1:47 | history | edited | Reid Barton |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 21, 2010 at 0:57 | answer | added | Tony Huynh | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 27, 2009 at 6:37 | answer | added | some guy on the street | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 24, 2009 at 2:07 | answer | added | Rodrigo Barbosa | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 23, 2009 at 20:13 | answer | added | Lior Bary-Soroker | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 23, 2009 at 0:18 | answer | added | zvasilyev | timeline score: 12 | |
| Nov 22, 2009 at 5:46 | answer | added | M.G. | timeline score: 13 | |
| Nov 22, 2009 at 5:02 | answer | added | Ulrik Buchholtz | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 21, 2009 at 21:40 | answer | added | Jose Capco | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 21, 2009 at 14:51 | answer | added | Boris Bukh | timeline score: 25 | |
| Nov 21, 2009 at 11:32 | answer | added | Gil Kalai | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 14, 2009 at 14:45 | answer | added | Akhil Mathew | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 20:48 | answer | added | Sam Derbyshire | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 20:32 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 34 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 19:32 | answer | added | Pierre Weil | timeline score: 34 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 18:33 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | Thanks. I had the idea for the question weeks ago, just had to get the right scansion. | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 18:12 | answer | added | JB King | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 16:46 | answer | added | Qiaochu Yuan | timeline score: 15 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 16:42 | answer | added | Tom Leinster | timeline score: 67 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 16:16 | answer | added | Dinakar Muthiah | timeline score: 18 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 16:16 | answer | added | Charles Siegel | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 16:12 | answer | added | Dan Piponi | timeline score: 20 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 16:12 | answer | added | Autumn Kent | timeline score: 10 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 15:54 | answer | added | Harrison Brown | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 14:58 | comment | added | GMRA | I like the Dire straits reference ;) | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 14:52 | answer | added | Andrew Stacey | timeline score: 17 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 14:48 | history | asked | Andrew Stacey | CC BY-SA 2.5 |