Timeline for Rolling without slipping interpretation of torsion
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22 at 7:21 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
a minor typo
|
| Feb 5, 2019 at 12:09 | history | edited | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
broken images fixed (click 'rendered output' to see the difference); for more info, see https://meta.mathoverflow.net/a/4058/70594
|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 22:43 | comment | added | user142 | David, do you know of a reference for a rigorous version (and proof) of the statement you give? (A semi-rigorous proof would also be helpful.) | |
| Jan 27, 2011 at 18:01 | history | edited | David E Speyer | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 39 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2011 at 17:28 | history | edited | David E Speyer | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added images
|
| Jan 27, 2011 at 3:29 | history | edited | David E Speyer | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 186 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2011 at 2:58 | history | answered | David E Speyer | CC BY-SA 2.5 |