Timeline for Linear transformation that preserves the determinant
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2020 at 12:54 | comment | added | Mikko Korhonen | The answer is positive over any algebraically closed field. See the following question at math.stackexchange: link. | |
| Jan 24, 2020 at 15:46 | comment | added | Eric Wofsey | You're right, and apparently it took over 10 years for anyone to catch that! I've corrected the argument at the end. | |
| Jan 24, 2020 at 15:45 | history | edited | Eric Wofsey | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 494 characters in body
|
| Jan 24, 2020 at 14:48 | comment | added | Zach Teitler | Well, just to nitpick a bit, there are some minor wrinkles, like if $T\begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix} a & -b \\ -c & d \end{pmatrix}$. Then we would have to change $T$ one more time by conjugating with $\operatorname{diag}(1,-1)$ or similar. | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 17:40 | history | edited | Eric Wofsey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
texify and minor corrections
|
| Oct 15, 2009 at 0:57 | history | edited | Eric Wofsey | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 153 characters in body
|
| Oct 15, 2009 at 0:30 | history | answered | Eric Wofsey | CC BY-SA 2.5 |