Timeline for Infinitely many primes of the form $2^n+c$ as $n$ varies?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Dec 30, 2016 at 7:02 | history | edited | Arturo Magidin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting
|
S Dec 30, 2016 at 7:02 | history | suggested | user57432 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting
|
Dec 30, 2016 at 6:34 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Dec 30, 2016 at 7:02 | |||||
Jul 9, 2013 at 22:22 | history | edited | Ricardo Andrade | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed math displays
|
Nov 13, 2009 at 14:39 | history | edited | Harrison Brown | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 520 characters in body
|
Nov 13, 2009 at 14:00 | history | edited | Harrison Brown | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1403 characters in body
|
Nov 13, 2009 at 12:25 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | Yes. Indeed Anton's comment in 5191 gives another example (c=3,d=5) where there's a (similar-looking but slightly harder) proof that they can both only be prime finitely often. I also agree that probably the local conditions won't always save you (again follow Anton's idea and find explicit n,c,d such that 2^n+c and 2^n+d aren't prime but only have nice juicy prime factors of size > 10^6). So now we need some sensible heuristics to continue, if there are any sensible heuristics on these matters. I guess it's also worth remarking that no-one has said anything about Q1 yet. | |
Nov 13, 2009 at 12:15 | history | answered | Harrison Brown | CC BY-SA 2.5 |