Skip to main content
66 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 9, 2022 at 19:13 answer added Thomas Kojar timeline score: 2
Dec 9, 2022 at 17:33 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
... -> …, while this is on the front page
Jan 25, 2021 at 20:40 comment added Gil Kalai What about a question: "A mathematical theory you would like to see developed." Or perhaps "Mathematical theory you would like to learn (if somebody would just develop them...)"
Sep 13, 2020 at 3:37 answer added A413 timeline score: 4
Sep 12, 2020 at 7:11 answer added Alexander Schmeding timeline score: 3
Sep 11, 2020 at 23:40 answer added Joseph O'Rourke timeline score: 2
Sep 11, 2020 at 18:14 answer added Sam Hopkins timeline score: 5
Sep 11, 2020 at 17:30 answer added Mirco A. Mannucci timeline score: 11
Sep 11, 2020 at 16:38 answer added Tim Campion timeline score: 3
Mar 17, 2020 at 18:24 history protected YCor
Jun 19, 2019 at 20:49 answer added Saal Hardali timeline score: 1
Jun 19, 2019 at 16:56 answer added Tim Campion timeline score: 15
Jun 3, 2017 at 6:47 answer added Phil Harmsworth timeline score: 9
Dec 31, 2015 at 18:00 answer added Incnis Mrsi timeline score: 8
Oct 9, 2015 at 20:35 answer added user261406 timeline score: 9
Oct 9, 2015 at 5:12 comment added Gerry Myerson The Tropic of Calculus (as suggested by Tom Lehrer). 50 Shades of Gray Codes. Lady Chatterly's Prover.
Oct 9, 2015 at 4:44 answer added user60504 timeline score: 3
Oct 25, 2011 at 20:06 answer added Todd Eisworth timeline score: 15
Oct 25, 2011 at 20:02 answer added Zeeshan Mahmud timeline score: 6
Mar 6, 2011 at 7:13 answer added user2529 timeline score: 14
Feb 5, 2011 at 16:59 comment added inkspot Mumford's "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface" is a great solution to 5), different from and (for me) more geometrically appealing than Demazure and Gabriel.
Feb 5, 2011 at 2:59 answer added Andreas Holmstrom timeline score: 16
Feb 2, 2011 at 10:26 answer added Anonymous timeline score: 0
Feb 2, 2011 at 8:57 answer added Marko Amnell timeline score: 21
Feb 2, 2011 at 3:53 answer added Andrés E. Caicedo timeline score: 8
Feb 2, 2011 at 2:20 answer added Mark timeline score: 22
Feb 1, 2011 at 15:03 comment added Gil Kalai Maybe there is a place for the dual question: "Books you would like to write (if somebody would just read them)" so people can mention their book ideas and get some feedback.
Feb 1, 2011 at 0:07 comment added Joseph O'Rourke It strikes me that many of the knowledgeable participants who made wonderfully detailed suggestions for a book on a coherent topic from a particular viewpoint, are well-positioned to write the very book they wish to read!
Jan 31, 2011 at 14:59 answer added Daniel Moskovich timeline score: 47
Jan 31, 2011 at 13:56 answer added Holzinger Raphael timeline score: 10
Jan 31, 2011 at 13:34 answer added Qfwfq timeline score: 77
Jan 30, 2011 at 18:29 answer added Jim Humphreys timeline score: 51
Jan 27, 2011 at 13:35 answer added Seamus timeline score: 6
Jan 27, 2011 at 4:36 comment added Sean Rostami functor-of-points: besides Demazure-Gabriel, there is also the last chapter of Eisenbud-Harris "Geometry of Schemes"
Jan 27, 2011 at 4:19 answer added Chandan Singh Dalawat timeline score: 27
Jan 27, 2011 at 4:17 answer added Chandan Singh Dalawat timeline score: 16
Jan 26, 2011 at 23:30 comment added AFK One more reference on the Weil conjectures: notes of Beilinson's lectures on the subject available at math.uchicago.edu/~mitya/beilinson
Jan 26, 2011 at 20:25 answer added Mikhail Bondarko timeline score: 28
Jan 25, 2011 at 9:16 answer added Gunnar Þór Magnússon timeline score: 40
Jan 25, 2011 at 8:15 answer added Ariyan Javanpeykar timeline score: 19
Jan 24, 2011 at 22:25 answer added Thomas Riepe timeline score: 34
Jan 24, 2011 at 19:36 answer added Yemon Choi timeline score: 19
Jan 24, 2011 at 19:25 answer added John D. Cook timeline score: 21
Jan 24, 2011 at 17:55 comment added Donu Arapura Qiaochu: Demazure and Gabriel wrote a book using the functor of points approach over 3 decades ago. Some people love this book, while others...
Jan 24, 2011 at 17:21 answer added Dmitri Pavlov timeline score: 20
Jan 24, 2011 at 15:58 comment added Qiaochu Yuan It boggles my mind that nobody has written 5) yet. Shouldn't one of Grothendieck's students be doing this or something?
Jan 24, 2011 at 15:31 comment added Andrea Ferretti @Tom: Sadly Lack's account is hardly an introduction to 2-categories, skipping even the definitions (!) and all motivation. It would be even less suitable for a "working mathematician".
Jan 24, 2011 at 15:14 answer added Yann Palu timeline score: 11
Jan 24, 2011 at 14:55 answer added gowers timeline score: 117
Jan 24, 2011 at 14:26 answer added John D. Cook timeline score: 26
Jan 24, 2011 at 14:16 comment added Gonçalo Marques Thank you for your suggestions I will look for Katz and Deligne's articles. I am aware of Freitag and Kiehl's textbook, unfortunately it's a hard to find. I was thinking of a textbook that would use the Weil conjectures as a "leitmotiv" while introducing some of the more modern characters in algebraic geometry. But maybe it can't be done (at least at level I would understand...).
Jan 24, 2011 at 14:11 answer added Chandan Singh Dalawat timeline score: 31
Jan 24, 2011 at 14:07 answer added Johannes Ebert timeline score: 56
Jan 24, 2011 at 12:44 comment added Emerton Regarding the Weil conjectures, have you read the appendix to Hartshorne that discusses these? If so, you could also try Nick Katz's exposition on Deligne's work in the Hilbert's Problems book (in the Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Math series) from the 1970s. Also, Deligne's article Weil I is less technical than you might guess, and there is also the textbook by Freitag and Kiehl.
Jan 24, 2011 at 12:39 answer added John D. Cook timeline score: 50
Jan 24, 2011 at 12:28 comment added Gonçalo Marques Thanks Dylan. Tim: it would be great indeed if JB would publish his "higher algebra" but his past expository work is already amazing. Tom: I am aware of that paper (and you also have some sections about it on your wonderful book) but I was thinking about a full textbook presentation that might have more examples and applications.
Jan 24, 2011 at 12:17 answer added David Hansen timeline score: 14
Jan 24, 2011 at 11:56 answer added darij grinberg timeline score: 32
Jan 24, 2011 at 11:36 answer added Dirk Basson timeline score: 38
Jan 24, 2011 at 11:31 comment added Tom Leinster Steve Lack wrote something approximating (2): arxiv.org/abs/math/0702535
Jan 24, 2011 at 11:00 answer added user8594 timeline score: 36
Jan 24, 2011 at 10:51 comment added Tim van Beek Yeah, but as most of you probably already know, JB won't write (2) nor his projected "higher algebra", because he thinks that he worked off his debt by writing all those expository papers...
Jan 24, 2011 at 10:41 answer added Lorenzo timeline score: 15
Jan 24, 2011 at 10:33 answer added Dylan Wilson timeline score: 27
Jan 24, 2011 at 10:30 comment added Dylan Wilson I really like this question... hopefully someone will take a hint and write number (5) and (2) sometime soon!
Jan 24, 2011 at 10:23 history asked Gonçalo Marques CC BY-SA 2.5