Timeline for Linear transformation that preserves the determinant
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22 at 13:57 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added a DOI link
|
| Jan 24, 2020 at 8:21 | comment | added | Zach Teitler | Unfortunately, this article does not prove the theorem OP is asking about, i.e., Frobenius's linear determinant preserver theorem. In fact the article uses Frobenius's theorem in its proof. The basic point of the article is to show that the seemingly weaker hypothesis actually implies linearity, and then Frobenius's theorem can be applied. | |
| Jun 9, 2019 at 14:05 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | What can be said about trace preserving maps? | |
| Oct 21, 2015 at 8:20 | history | edited | Denis Serre | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 67 characters in body
|
| Oct 17, 2015 at 21:16 | comment | added | Alon Amit | @Arul, I updated the link. | |
| Oct 17, 2015 at 21:15 | history | edited | Alon Amit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 173 characters in body
|
| Oct 17, 2015 at 21:12 | comment | added | user76479 | link does not work | |
| Oct 15, 2009 at 1:14 | comment | added | Alon Amit | Of course - just missed that. It may actually make the claim easier to prove, I'm not sure. | |
| Oct 15, 2009 at 1:13 | history | edited | Alon Amit | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 88 characters in body
|
| Oct 15, 2009 at 0:11 | comment | added | David E Speyer | It seems to me that the added hypothesis follows from the requirement that phi is linear. Am I missing something? | |
| Oct 14, 2009 at 23:19 | history | answered | Alon Amit | CC BY-SA 2.5 |