Timeline for Shannon's communication paper and finite differences
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 21, 2011 at 9:58 | history | edited | Did | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 55 characters in body
|
Jan 21, 2011 at 7:57 | history | edited | Did | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 13 characters in body
|
Jan 21, 2011 at 6:45 | comment | added | Did | Sure, if $t\mapsto N$ is not (Lebesgue) measurable at some small values of $t$, this "pathology" could propagate to larger values of $t$ by the recursion equation. (Was that your original question?) To ensure the asymptotics $N(t)=(C+o(1))X_0^t$, one could assume that $t\mapsto N(t)$ is measurable and (say) bounded "at the beginning", i.e. on $[0,t_0]$. (So regular as measurable is needed but regular as monotone is not.) | |
Jan 21, 2011 at 4:29 | vote | accept | Anthony Quas | ||
Jan 21, 2011 at 4:28 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | This is very nice. I still think that there are counterexamples of non-measurable $N(t)$: let $T$ be the countable subgroup of $\mathbb R$ generated by the $t_i$ and pick representative elements of each coset of $T$ in $\mathbb R$. You can then find a solution that looks like a different multiple of $X_0^t$ on each coset (maybe some positive and some negative). | |
Jan 20, 2011 at 22:06 | history | answered | Did | CC BY-SA 2.5 |