Timeline for Consecutive numbers with n prime factors
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 20, 2011 at 6:50 | comment | added | Darrell Plank | Aaron is, strictly speaking, correct, but it's a really interesting paper anyway. Thanks for the link! | |
Jan 19, 2011 at 17:04 | comment | added | Aaron Meyerowitz | I agree that it is a great reference, relevant to this question, and maybe a better question. I enjoyed seeing the paper. Just wanted to mention the differences. | |
Jan 19, 2011 at 6:23 | comment | added | Matthew Conroy | The OP didn't indicate that they'd viewed any literature, so I figured this paper, with its references, would help them see some of the results in the field, i.e. it would be a place to start. Please go ahead and give a more relevant reference if you've got one. | |
Jan 19, 2011 at 2:55 | comment | added | Aaron Meyerowitz | It is a good paper. However it counts $40=2^35$ as having 4 prime factors so it is not the same question. | |
Jan 18, 2011 at 20:27 | history | edited | Andrés E. Caicedo | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 266 characters in body
|
Jan 18, 2011 at 20:20 | history | answered | Matthew Conroy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |