Timeline for "extend a functor"
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2011 at 15:26 | comment | added | unknown | ok. The statement was not correct in details because what I want to know is that if there are good "settings" for $G\rightarrow M$ and $L\rightarrow S$ in order to solve the "descent" from normal scheme to schemes which are less "good". | |
| Jan 18, 2011 at 7:58 | comment | added | Laurent Moret-Bailly | I doubt that you really mean "every family of group schemes", without further restriction. Next, what do you mean by "is the pullback in a unique way"? I understand this as "there is a unique isomorphism of $L$ with the pullback", which implies that $L$ has no nontrivial automorphisms! | |
| Jan 18, 2011 at 0:30 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Why did you mention the functor F? It doesn't seem relevant to the question at all. I don't think the question warrants the category-theory tag. | |
| Jan 17, 2011 at 23:22 | answer | added | Sándor Kovács | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 17, 2011 at 22:18 | history | asked | unknown | CC BY-SA 2.5 |