Timeline for Geometric meaning of the Euler sequence on $\mathbb{P}^n$ (Example 8.20.1 in Ch II of Hartshorne)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2020 at 20:42 | answer | added | Y_q | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 27, 2019 at 2:03 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Aug 27, 2019 at 7:49 | |||||
| S Dec 11, 2016 at 6:07 | history | suggested | Bombyx mori | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed Latex error
|
| Dec 11, 2016 at 5:39 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 11, 2016 at 6:07 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2014 at 2:09 | answer | added | Ashwath Rabindranath | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 15:20 | vote | accept | Enrique Acosta | ||
| Nov 13, 2009 at 11:33 | answer | added | Jonathan Wise | timeline score: 16 | |
| Nov 13, 2009 at 10:08 | answer | added | Alex Collins | timeline score: 12 | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 22:41 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 26 | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 21:51 | vote | accept | Enrique Acosta | ||
| Nov 13, 2009 at 2:23 | |||||
| Nov 12, 2009 at 19:50 | history | edited | Enrique Acosta | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title
|
| Nov 12, 2009 at 19:48 | history | rollback | Enrique Acosta |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| Nov 12, 2009 at 19:48 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | It's best not to use dollar signs in the titles, since jsMath doesn't render the front page. | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 19:48 | history | edited | Kim Morrison | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
removing latex from title
|
| Nov 12, 2009 at 19:47 | history | edited | Enrique Acosta | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 108 characters in body
|
| Nov 12, 2009 at 19:38 | history | edited | Enrique Acosta | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title
|
| Nov 12, 2009 at 19:37 | comment | added | Enrique Acosta | Yes, I agree, I'l change the title | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 19:05 | comment | added | 1-- | Would it be useful to change the title of this question to 'Geometric meaning of the Euler sequence on $\mathbb{P}^n$?' This might be more meaningful to those browsing through the question titles, but without a copy of Hartshorne on hand.... | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 18:18 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | \mathcal works. | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 18:12 | answer | added | Kevin H. Lin | timeline score: 52 | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 18:09 | comment | added | Charles Siegel | Ok, as I mentioned below, no mathscr, so the sequence is $0\to O\to O(1)^{n+1}\to T_{\mathbb{P}^n}\to 0$. | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 18:07 | answer | added | Charles Siegel | timeline score: 30 | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 18:07 | comment | added | Charles Siegel | The sequence in question is that on $\mathbb{P}^n$, we have $0\to \mathscr{O}\to \mathscr{O}(1)^{n+1}\to T_{\mathbb{P}^n}\to 0$. | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 17:51 | comment | added | Alon Amit | I think you'll get a lot more people to think about that question if you mention what the exact sequences actually are. | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 17:45 | history | asked | Enrique Acosta | CC BY-SA 2.5 |