Timeline for Is being finitely generated a local property?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2011 at 1:30 | comment | added | 14555 | Well, in this case I don't think there's a lot to choose from: from what I understood in EGA I (6.3.3), Grothendieck's proof is almost literally the same. I just wanted to provide an option of not looking in EGA: I myself don't read french, so I really don't like it when made to look there. | |
| Jan 15, 2011 at 1:18 | history | edited | 14555 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 423 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2011 at 8:49 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | roman, you are absolutely right. I have edited my text according to your rectification: thanks a lot for your careful reading. By the way, it is great that you have given users a purely algebraic proof: they can now choose, according to their preferences, between an algebraic and a geometric formulation. | |
| Jan 14, 2011 at 3:18 | history | edited | 14555 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 423 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2011 at 2:13 | history | undeleted | 14555 | ||
| Jan 14, 2011 at 2:13 | history | edited | 14555 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 322 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2011 at 1:53 | history | deleted | 14555 | ||
| Jan 14, 2011 at 0:08 | history | answered | 14555 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |