Timeline for Functorial way of showing that the Segre (or Plucker) morphism is a closed embedding?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2011 at 21:38 | comment | added | Akhil Mathew | OK, I've thought this over: this is a very nice explanation for the Segre embedding, and one which really motivates it better. Thanks! | |
| Jan 13, 2011 at 21:37 | vote | accept | Akhil Mathew | ||
| Jan 13, 2011 at 4:06 | comment | added | Akhil Mathew | So this is how Grothendieck defines the Segre embedding in EGA II (or the new edition of EGA I). There is of course an explicit description of it as well. (I realize this is tangential: I need to think about this a little!) | |
| Jan 12, 2011 at 14:34 | history | edited | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 56 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2011 at 14:27 | history | answered | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |