Timeline for Automorphisms of the Selberg class
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2011 at 6:28 | comment | added | David Hansen | While the Selberg class is a nice way of organizing the observed properties of L-functions, may I suggest that it is not much more than that, at least in the current state of the subject? Witness, for example, the immense effort required on the part of Kaczorowski-Perelli to prove that nothing in the Selberg class has degree $1<d<2$ (this appeared in the Annals of Math. recently). If a statement of such tempting simplicity requires Sisyphean expenditures,... | |
| Mar 13, 2011 at 22:04 | answer | added | Denis Chaperon de Lauzières | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 13, 2011 at 20:30 | answer | added | David Hansen | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 13, 2011 at 20:02 | answer | added | Sylvain JULIEN | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jan 22, 2011 at 17:43 | vote | accept | Sylvain JULIEN | ||
| Jan 15, 2011 at 12:13 | comment | added | Sylvain JULIEN | Yes indeed, it is just the product of the functions $F_i$. | |
| Jan 5, 2011 at 16:36 | comment | added | David Hansen | What is the "dot" operation in 4)? Is it just multiplication of Dirichlet series? | |
| Dec 30, 2010 at 18:38 | answer | added | GH from MO | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 30, 2010 at 18:00 | history | edited | Sylvain JULIEN | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 83 characters in body
|
| Dec 29, 2010 at 14:58 | history | edited | Sylvain JULIEN | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 10 characters in body; edited body
|
| Dec 28, 2010 at 17:47 | history | asked | Sylvain JULIEN | CC BY-SA 2.5 |