Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 27, 2010 at 0:32 vote accept soulphysics
Dec 24, 2010 at 22:52 answer added Gerald Edgar timeline score: 5
Dec 24, 2010 at 17:38 comment added Pietro Majer You are asking why $(f\circ g)(A)= f(g(A))$. The answer is, it is just a matter of functional calculus; check any textbook on the topic.
Dec 24, 2010 at 16:59 comment added fedja The Taylor expansion of the logarithm diverges more often than not. There is no reason to expect it to converge for $e^A$. Of course, if everything is defined as a series and you can meaningfully plug series into series justifying all passages to the limits, the identity holds. On the other hand, if the right hand side just fails to exist or has multiple values like non-integer powers of complex numbers (the first example to look at), the question hardly makes sense.
Dec 24, 2010 at 16:44 comment added soulphysics @fedja -- One way is the Taylor expansion: $A^r = \Sigma^\infty_{n=0}\frac{r^n \log^n(A)}{n!},$ where the logarithms are again defined by their Taylor expansions. @arsmath -- That's a way to define the operator $e^X$ (where $X$ is in the Banach algebra), but what's needed is $X^r$.
Dec 24, 2010 at 16:09 comment added arsmath The conventional definition is to use the limit of (1 + x/n)^n as n goes to infinity. (There's a slightly different variants that's more likely to converge, but I can't remember what it is.)
Dec 24, 2010 at 15:59 comment added Denis Serre follows from the Baker-Hausdorff lemma and the fact that $[A,A]=0$: isn't is pedantic ? Just say that $[A,B]=0$ implies $e^{A+B}=e^Ae^B$.
Dec 24, 2010 at 15:36 comment added Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Using the binomial series, I guess?
Dec 24, 2010 at 15:35 comment added fedja How do you define the non-integer powers for arbitrary Banach algebra elements?
Dec 24, 2010 at 15:29 history asked soulphysics CC BY-SA 2.5