Timeline for The Hardy Z-function and failure of the Riemann hypothesis
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Feb 23, 2014 at 21:12 | history | edited | Ricardo Andrade | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added top level tag
|
| Feb 23, 2014 at 20:23 | comment | added | user130144 | The "strong failure" extrema might have a different tendency. Some form of approximate universality should be maintained if they are forced to on average decrease in magnitude; this might induce a rate of growth in $Z$ different from that expected assuming RH. What is the tendency of the "near failure" extrema (where $Z$ almost fails to change sign)? | |
| Apr 10, 2011 at 10:09 | answer | added | Marc Palm | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 28, 2011 at 6:49 | answer | added | David Bernier | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 27, 2010 at 4:59 | vote | accept | David Hansen | ||
| Dec 23, 2010 at 21:27 | comment | added | David Hansen | Two downvotes with no explanation at all? Mystifying. | |
| Dec 23, 2010 at 17:43 | answer | added | Terry Tao | timeline score: 35 | |
| Dec 23, 2010 at 16:23 | history | asked | David Hansen | CC BY-SA 2.5 |