Timeline for A question about group action on topological space

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

12 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Dec 25, 2010 at 17:15	history	edited	Hugo Chapdelaine	CC BY-SA 2.5	edited title
Dec 23, 2010 at 3:08	history	edited	Hugo Chapdelaine	CC BY-SA 2.5	deleted 405 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Dec 23, 2010 at 2:20	vote	accept	Hugo Chapdelaine
Dec 23, 2010 at 1:45	answer	added	Dick Palais		timeline score: 6
Dec 22, 2010 at 17:21	comment	added	Hugo Chapdelaine		Yes @Matthew you were right these 2 sentences were confusing I deleted them. The point is if $X$ il locally compact then the group $Aut(X)$ can be turned into a topological group in a natural way using the compact-open topology.
Dec 22, 2010 at 14:17	history	edited	Hugo Chapdelaine	CC BY-SA 2.5	deleted 217 characters in body
Dec 22, 2010 at 13:37	history	edited	Hugo Chapdelaine		edited tags
Dec 22, 2010 at 13:35	comment	added	Hugo Chapdelaine		Hi algori, well these two questions arose naturally to me in the context of Hermitian symmetric domains. I would like to see how this symmetric condition can fail even though the homogeneous condition holds.
Dec 22, 2010 at 13:22	history	edited	Hugo Chapdelaine	CC BY-SA 2.5	deleted 238 characters in body
Dec 22, 2010 at 5:43	comment	added	Emerton		I am confused by your second sentence. If $Aut(X)$ has the discrete topology and $\rho$ is continuous, doesn't this mean that some n.h. of $1$ in $G$ has to mapped to the identity in $Aut(X)$, i.e. that some n.h. of $1$ in $G$ acts trivially on all of $X$. Is this part of your assumptions, or am I misunderstanding what you wrote?
Dec 22, 2010 at 5:41	comment	added	algori		Hugo -- it is not very clear (to me) what these questions have to do with differential geometry.
Dec 22, 2010 at 4:21	history	asked	Hugo Chapdelaine	CC BY-SA 2.5