Timeline for The conjectural relation between mixed motivic sheaves and the perverse t-structure.
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2010 at 15:55 | vote | accept | Mikhail Bondarko | ||
| Dec 18, 2010 at 19:47 | history | edited | Mikhail Bondarko | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 52 characters in body
|
| Dec 18, 2010 at 18:52 | comment | added | Mikhail Bondarko | I looked at the Beilinson's height pairing paper; yet I was not able to find a precise formulation. | |
| Dec 18, 2010 at 18:35 | comment | added | Bhargav | A (slightly informal) version of such a conjecture is discussed in Jannsen's article in Motives 1 (section 4.8), and he refers to Beilinson's height pairings paper for a reference. | |
| Dec 18, 2010 at 18:35 | history | edited | Mikhail Bondarko | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 123 characters in body
|
| Dec 18, 2010 at 18:24 | history | edited | Mikhail Bondarko | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 123 characters in body
|
| Dec 18, 2010 at 18:18 | comment | added | Mikhail Bondarko | Most of the book is dedicated to motives over a field; possibly, in some small part of it 'relative' motives are considered. | |
| Dec 18, 2010 at 14:37 | answer | added | AFK | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 18, 2010 at 13:14 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Is this asserted in Huber's book, or does she restrict $S$ to be the spectrum of a field? | |
| Dec 18, 2010 at 13:00 | history | asked | Mikhail Bondarko | CC BY-SA 2.5 |