Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 4
  • 35
  • 40

My understanding is that this is roughly the jumping off point of noncommutative geometrynoncommutative geometry. There has also been recent work which is more algebraic in spirit than the main body of noncommutative geometry, which tends to be functional analysis. For one entry point, see the paper

  • William Crawley-Boevey, Pavel Etingof, Victor Ginzburg, Noncommutative geometry and quiver algebras, Advances in Mathematics 209 Issue 1 (2007) pp 274–336, doi:10.1016/j.aim.2006.05.004, arXiv:math/0502301

My understanding is that this is roughly the jumping off point of noncommutative geometry. There has also been recent work which is more algebraic in spirit than the main body of noncommutative geometry, which tends to be functional analysis. For one entry point, see the paper

  • William Crawley-Boevey, Pavel Etingof, Victor Ginzburg, Noncommutative geometry and quiver algebras, Advances in Mathematics 209 Issue 1 (2007) pp 274–336, doi:10.1016/j.aim.2006.05.004, arXiv:math/0502301

My understanding is that this is roughly the jumping off point of noncommutative geometry. There has also been recent work which is more algebraic in spirit than the main body of noncommutative geometry, which tends to be functional analysis. For one entry point, see the paper

  • William Crawley-Boevey, Pavel Etingof, Victor Ginzburg, Noncommutative geometry and quiver algebras, Advances in Mathematics 209 Issue 1 (2007) pp 274–336, doi:10.1016/j.aim.2006.05.004, arXiv:math/0502301
fixed arxiv front-end link and gave full reference
Source Link
David Roberts ♦
David Roberts ♦
  • 35.5k
  • 11
  • 124
  • 349

My understanding is that this is roughly the jumping off point of noncommutative geometry. There has also been recent work which is more algebraic in spirit than the main body of noncommutative geometry, which tends to be functional analysis. For one entry point, see the paper of Crawley-Boevey, Etingof and Ginzburg on "Noncommutative geometry and quiver algebras."

  • William Crawley-Boevey, Pavel Etingof, Victor Ginzburg, Noncommutative geometry and quiver algebras, Advances in Mathematics 209 Issue 1 (2007) pp 274–336, doi:10.1016/j.aim.2006.05.004, arXiv:math/0502301

My understanding is that this is roughly the jumping off point of noncommutative geometry. There has also been recent work which is more algebraic in spirit than the main body of noncommutative geometry, which tends to be functional analysis. For one entry point, see the paper of Crawley-Boevey, Etingof and Ginzburg on "Noncommutative geometry and quiver algebras."

My understanding is that this is roughly the jumping off point of noncommutative geometry. There has also been recent work which is more algebraic in spirit than the main body of noncommutative geometry, which tends to be functional analysis. For one entry point, see the paper

  • William Crawley-Boevey, Pavel Etingof, Victor Ginzburg, Noncommutative geometry and quiver algebras, Advances in Mathematics 209 Issue 1 (2007) pp 274–336, doi:10.1016/j.aim.2006.05.004, arXiv:math/0502301
Source Link
Ben Webster ♦
Ben Webster ♦
  • 44.7k
  • 12
  • 126
  • 260

My understanding is that this is roughly the jumping off point of noncommutative geometry. There has also been recent work which is more algebraic in spirit than the main body of noncommutative geometry, which tends to be functional analysis. For one entry point, see the paper of Crawley-Boevey, Etingof and Ginzburg on "Noncommutative geometry and quiver algebras."