Timeline for Is the following graph well known?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 9, 2011 at 20:19 | comment | added | Jon Noel | If anyone is interested, here is a link to a paper that deals with graphs that are similar to (but more general than) Johnson Graphs: arXiv. It doesn't answer the question though, just an interesting paper that is somewhat relevant to this topic. | |
Jan 4, 2011 at 22:45 | history | edited | Tyson Williams | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Fixed mistake in last edit
|
Jan 4, 2011 at 22:40 | vote | accept | Tyson Williams | ||
Jan 4, 2011 at 22:28 | history | edited | Tyson Williams | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added that its a regular graph and the value of the parameter
|
Dec 17, 2010 at 4:34 | answer | added | Aaron Meyerowitz | timeline score: 5 | |
Dec 15, 2010 at 22:22 | history | edited | Tyson Williams | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 187 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; Post Made Community Wiki
|
Dec 15, 2010 at 21:07 | history | edited | Tyson Williams | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 10 characters in body; edited body
|
Dec 15, 2010 at 20:51 | comment | added | Matthew Kahle | I finally understand what you are asking --- to clarify you might indicate that the $k$-tuples in your graph are ordered k-tuples. | |
Dec 15, 2010 at 20:26 | history | edited | Tyson Williams | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 276 characters in body
|
Dec 15, 2010 at 20:18 | history | edited | Tyson Williams | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 55 characters in body
|
Dec 15, 2010 at 19:49 | history | edited | Tyson Williams | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 18 characters in body
|
Dec 15, 2010 at 19:43 | history | edited | Tyson Williams | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 50 characters in body; deleted 38 characters in body
|
Dec 15, 2010 at 19:31 | history | edited | Tyson Williams | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 124 characters in body
|
Dec 15, 2010 at 19:31 | answer | added | Igor Rivin | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 15, 2010 at 19:26 | history | asked | Tyson Williams | CC BY-SA 2.5 |