Timeline for Tools for long-distance collaboration
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
27 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2020 at 1:33 | answer | added | bof | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Oct 19, 2016 at 19:58 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
| Mar 23, 2015 at 0:35 | answer | added | Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 8, 2013 at 12:43 | answer | added | Michael Murray | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 24, 2012 at 11:38 | comment | added | Willie Wong | Having just returned from an AIM SQUARES, I have to say that since their math castle (aimath.org/about/morganhill.html) hasn't yet been built, the current "warehouse" setting of the AIM is very conducive to research, despite being situated in the middle of Palo Alto in sunny California. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 15:07 | answer | added | Stefan Waldmann | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 14:13 | answer | added | B. Bischof | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 14:07 | answer | added | jbenet | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 16, 2010 at 8:12 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | I agree that you are using the word correctly, but think that the sentence using it is daft. Once you've proved the result, why do you need to check the heuristics? The heuristics presumably helped you find the proof, but once you have the proof, they've played their part and can be forgotten. (I'll go back into my snow cave now.) | |
| Dec 15, 2010 at 17:42 | answer | added | Kostya | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 15, 2010 at 13:58 | comment | added | Willie Wong | @Pietro and Ben: similarly to the RiP is the AIM SQUARES program aimath.org/research/squares.html one of which I will be doing sometime next year. I'll try to report back whether it is sufficiently isolated like Oberwolfach to be conducive to research. :) | |
| Dec 15, 2010 at 13:55 | comment | added | Willie Wong | @Andrew: I am using heuristics correctly, I hope, to mean "ideas gathered from past experience". So stop grumbling. | |
| Dec 15, 2010 at 13:21 | answer | added | Greg Graviton | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 22:25 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | Pietro- RiP is great (I've done it, and recommend it heartily), but that's not long-distance collaboration. That's all flying to the same place. | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 20:32 | answer | added | Larry Stout | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 20:02 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | another great method: Oberwolfach Research in Pair program: mfo.de | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 19:55 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | grumble grumble heuristics grumble grumble | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 19:49 | answer | added | Andrew Stacey | timeline score: 12 | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 19:44 | answer | added | domenico fiorenza | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 18:00 | answer | added | Peter Krautzberger | timeline score: 21 | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 16:04 | comment | added | Gil Kalai | Great question! (I know that some people find private blogs very useful.) | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 15:50 | answer | added | Beth | timeline score: 11 | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 15:37 | answer | added | sleepless in beantown | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 14:01 | answer | added | Michael Bächtold | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 13:21 | answer | added | h10 | timeline score: -1 | |
| Dec 14, 2010 at 13:11 | history | asked | Willie Wong | CC BY-SA 2.5 |