Timeline for Proofs that require fundamentally new ways of thinking
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2013 at 21:59 | comment | added | Deane Yang | Partial Differential Relations? I don't believe the h-principle requires much analysis. In the sections on isometric embeddings, he does state and give a complete analytic proof of the version of the Nash-Moser implicit function he needs. | |
| Dec 3, 2013 at 6:35 | comment | added | Koushik | is that book completelyy rigorous because i have been told that his papers aren't from analytic standpoint | |
| Dec 11, 2010 at 18:56 | history | edited | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 31 characters in body
|
| Dec 11, 2010 at 18:44 | history | answered | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |