Skip to main content
Corrected two typos
Source Link
gowers
  • 29k
  • 29
  • 145
  • 182

Gromov's proof that finitely generated groups with polynomial growth are viruallyvirtually nilpotent. The ingeniusingenious step is to consider a scaling limit of the usual metric on the Cayley graph of the finitely generated group.

Of course the details are messy and to get the final conclusion one has to rely on a lot of deep results on the structure of topological groups. However, already the initial idea is breathtaking.

Gromov's proof that finitely generated groups with polynomial growth are virually nilpotent. The ingenius step is to consider a scaling limit of the usual metric on the Cayley graph of the finitely generated group.

Of course the details are messy and to get the final conclusion one has to rely on a lot of deep results on the structure of topological groups. However, already the initial idea is breathtaking.

Gromov's proof that finitely generated groups with polynomial growth are virtually nilpotent. The ingenious step is to consider a scaling limit of the usual metric on the Cayley graph of the finitely generated group.

Of course the details are messy and to get the final conclusion one has to rely on a lot of deep results on the structure of topological groups. However, already the initial idea is breathtaking.

Post Made Community Wiki
Source Link
Andreas Thom
  • 25.5k
  • 4
  • 82
  • 142

Gromov's proof that finitely generated groups with polynomial growth are virually nilpotent. The ingenius step is to consider a scaling limit of the usual metric on the Cayley graph of the finitely generated group.

Of course the details are messy and to get the final conclusion one has to rely on a lot of deep results on the structure of topological groups. However, already the initial idea is breathtaking.