Timeline for Eliminating redundant linear constraints? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2010 at 4:46 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | This sort of question is better suited for math.stackexchange.com | |
| Dec 10, 2010 at 4:33 | vote | accept | dsimcha | ||
| Dec 10, 2010 at 3:29 | history | closed |
Ryan Budney Andrés E. Caicedo Andy Putman Pete L. Clark S. Carnahan♦ |
too localized | |
| Dec 10, 2010 at 2:27 | answer | added | JBL | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 10, 2010 at 0:05 | comment | added | dsimcha | Researched Gaussian elim more, does what I need. Thanks. Too bad you didn't make it a full answer, or I would have accepted it. | |
| Dec 9, 2010 at 22:33 | comment | added | JBL | After edit: Gaussian elimination? | |
| Dec 9, 2010 at 22:12 | history | edited | dsimcha | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 681 characters in body
|
| Dec 9, 2010 at 19:41 | comment | added | Thierry Zell | Determinants are not the standard toolkit when grappling with a concrete matrix: row and column operations are. Now, your question is not clear, because you did not specify whether you're dealing with a concrete matrix or with a genuine NxN matrix for arbitrary N, so it's hard to give you a helpful answer. | |
| Dec 9, 2010 at 15:58 | comment | added | JBL | Gaussian elimination? | |
| Dec 9, 2010 at 15:48 | history | asked | dsimcha | CC BY-SA 2.5 |