Timeline for isotopy doesn't make sense (Milnor)
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2014 at 0:41 | history | edited | user9072 |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 10, 2010 at 8:55 | vote | accept | Ori | ||
| Dec 10, 2010 at 4:01 | answer | added | Emerton | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 7, 2010 at 8:17 | comment | added | Theo Buehler | Emerton, you're right. In order to understand this isotopy, I strongly suggest drawing a picture of the function $\varphi(\gamma) = ( 1 - \frac{\|\gamma - c\|}{r} )$... | |
| Dec 7, 2010 at 6:15 | comment | added | Emerton | Dear Ori, If you change the $-$ to a $+$ instead, doesn't everything then make sense? If so, then I'm right! | |
| Dec 7, 2010 at 6:04 | comment | added | Ori | I hope you're right | |
| Dec 7, 2010 at 5:56 | comment | added | Emerton | I suspect there is simply a typo, and that the defintion of $f^{c p}_u(\gamma)$ should be $\gamma + u(\text{etc. ...})$. | |
| Dec 7, 2010 at 5:32 | history | asked | Ori | CC BY-SA 2.5 |