Timeline for Never appeared forthcoming papers
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2011 at 23:48 | comment | added | Philip Brooker | Denis, good point about books vs papers. I will nevertheless leave my answer here because it is community wiki, so I don't get any reputation points for it. Moreover, for persons working in Banach space theory, the Classical Banach Spaces books are still one of the primary references for the subject, and as such are encountered regularly. | |
| Jan 31, 2011 at 1:53 | comment | added | Philip Brooker | Yemon, I still find time to entertain the fantasy that I will one day understand injective Banach spaces... | |
| Jan 31, 2011 at 1:52 | comment | added | Philip Brooker | Bill, according to my calculations that criterion does not in itself preclude the possibility of you presenting part III at your centenary conference :-) | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 8:10 | comment | added | Bill Johnson | Phil, at our present pace, the gap between parts II and III will be longer. | |
| Dec 7, 2010 at 8:00 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @Philip: that's the one I was thinking of! I was trying (without really understanding at the time) to learn about injective Banach spaces... | |
| Dec 7, 2010 at 6:28 | comment | added | Denis Serre | If books are allowed, there will be a ton of examples. Because it is much more difficult to put an end mark to a book than to an article. Let me give two items. The book on semi-groups by Benilan, Crandall and Pazy, the book on analytic geometry by Demailly. | |
| Dec 7, 2010 at 5:11 | comment | added | Philip Brooker | Although this is off-topic, this thread has reminded me of the fact that the papers Complementably universal Banach spaces and Complementably universal Banach spaces II by Johnson and Szankowski appeared in print some 33 years apart. I wonder if there is a bigger gap between a paper and its sequel? | |
| Dec 7, 2010 at 3:48 | comment | added | Philip Brooker | @Yemon: At least one such case occurs in the proof that $\ell_\infty$ is prime (Vol. I, p.57). Another instance occurs on p.106. | |
| Dec 7, 2010 at 3:24 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Weren't there actual proofs of results stated in I & II that were meant to appear in III & IV? | |
| Dec 6, 2010 at 23:35 | history | answered | Philip Brooker | CC BY-SA 2.5 |