Timeline for Few doubts about 'A new elementary proof of the Prime Number Theorem" by Richter
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 hours ago | comment | added | Conrad | I will look a bit later and see what happens | |
| 5 hours ago | comment | added | rr_math | That’s my idea too, and I tried to do as you suggest but it didn’t get me the desired O(1/N). | |
| 5 hours ago | comment | added | Conrad | as for the second question my feeling is that it has nothing to do with the Proposition $2.2$ itself but just replacing the index of summation from $n \le [N/q]$ to $n \le N, q |n$ and seeing what error we get given that $|g| \le 1$ and the various definitions of the projections $\mathbb E$ - that's where I would look | |
| 5 hours ago | vote | accept | rr_math | ||
| 5 hours ago | answer | added | Conrad | timeline score: 4 | |
| 6 hours ago | history | edited | rr_math | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body; edited title
|
| S 6 hours ago | history | suggested | CrSb0001 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting fix
|
| 6 hours ago | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S 6 hours ago | |||||
| 6 hours ago | history | asked | rr_math | CC BY-SA 4.0 |