Timeline for Kobayashi-Nomizu "Foundations of differential geometry" on page 117 wrong?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 hours ago | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Well, maybe if there is only a single error to fix, the Latinists would be happier if one used 'erratum' rather than 'errata'. Though I just learned that 'erratum' is for when the mistake is the publisher's, and 'corrigendum' for when the mistake is due to the author(s): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erratum | |
| 4 hours ago | history | edited | psl2Z | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| 4 hours ago | comment | added | psl2Z | @DavidRoberts Yes, I thought in Latin it just means error and it is the singular form of errata. I thought only errata is the page or document which lists the errors with corrections. But I will change it. | |
| 4 hours ago | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | An 'erratum' in mathematical publishing is usually a document correcting errors, I think you mean to ask simply if this is an error. | |
| 5 hours ago | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| 5 hours ago | history | asked | psl2Z | CC BY-SA 4.0 |