Skip to main content

Timeline for Size doubling amoeba

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
yesterday vote accept Nate River
yesterday answer added ofer zeitouni timeline score: 4
2 days ago comment added user65023 If $\epsilon > 2(\frac{1}{2})^{({1}/{p})}$, then $\lim_{t\in \infty} S_t^{\mbox{max}}=\infty$ almost surely. This follows from the strong law of large numbers. If you track the size of the original amoeba and pick one copy when it splits, then the expected size is $(\epsilon^p 2^q)^{n} \to \infty$, if $\epsilon^p 2^q >1$. By the strong law (or ergodic theorem), the size of this amoeba goes to infinity almost surely. This doesn't take into account that there might be on the order of $2^{pn}$ amoebas at stage $n$, so there is likely a better bound. Probably stating the obvious here.
Dec 15 at 6:55 comment added Nate River @mathworker21 It is the size before splitting. And yes, each amoeba evolves according to the same rule.
Dec 15 at 0:27 comment added mathworker21 Also, you said "it" after talking about the species, which I think you didn't mean to do. Is each amoeba evolving according to the rule (simultaneously)?
Dec 15 at 0:26 comment added mathworker21 Does $S$ denote the starting size of the amoeba (which you said is $1$) or the size right before splitting?
Dec 14 at 14:24 history edited Nate River CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 90 characters in body
Dec 14 at 13:56 comment added user531372 Great question. +1
Dec 14 at 12:38 comment added Nate River @M.G. Unfortunately it is about fictional amoeba, not mathematical amoeba :P
Dec 14 at 12:36 comment added M.G. I thought for a second there that the post was about tropical geometry :-)
Dec 14 at 12:30 history edited Nate River CC BY-SA 4.0
added 77 characters in body
Dec 14 at 12:20 history edited Nate River CC BY-SA 4.0
added 55 characters in body
Dec 14 at 12:13 history edited Nate River CC BY-SA 4.0
added 88 characters in body
Dec 14 at 12:08 history asked Nate River CC BY-SA 4.0