Timeline for An operator-norm version of Siegel's Lemma
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2010 at 6:36 | comment | added | Seva | @Wadim: thanks for the references. I will check them but, honestly, I think the similarity between my question and Siegel's Lemma is merely conceptual. | |
| Dec 6, 2010 at 11:45 | comment | added | Wadim Zudilin | Seva, without refereeing to your wanted case, I would suggest you looking at: Iskander Aliev, Siegel's lemma and sum-distinct sets. Discrete Comput. Geom. 39 (2008), no. 1-3, 59–66 (dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00454-008-9059-9), and Lenny Fukshansky, Siegel's lemma with additional conditions. J. Number Theory 120 (2006), no. 1, 13–25 (dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2005.11.009). Iskander is an expert in all possible versions of Siegel's lemma... | |
| Dec 6, 2010 at 9:59 | history | edited | Seva | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Dec 6, 2010 at 9:38 | comment | added | Seva | @Denis: Wikipedia has a brief and to-the-point article on Siegel's Lemma. (For some technical reason, I have troubles inserting the link.) | |
| Dec 6, 2010 at 6:50 | comment | added | Denis Serre | For beotians, could you give a formulation of Siegel's Lemma ? Thanks. | |
| Dec 5, 2010 at 21:18 | history | asked | Seva | CC BY-SA 2.5 |