Timeline for Is the pullback of differential forms on a compact manifold smooth tame as a map of Fréchet manifolds?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 10 at 21:14 | comment | added | Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro | This is consistent with seeing $f\in\text{Diff}(M)$ as a smooth section of the trivial bundle $\text{pr}_1:M\times M\ni(p_1,p_2)\mapsto p_1\in M$ once we identify $f$ with its graph as before. That's where the nonlinearity of the (first order) differential operator $(f,\omega)\mapsto f^*\omega$ comes in, for the differential operator $\omega\mapsto f^*\omega$ by itself is linear and of order zero. Likewise, one must see $(f,\omega)$ as smooth sections of the Whitney sum of $\text{pr}_1$ and $\tilde{\pi}$. | |
Dec 10 at 21:13 | comment | added | Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro | Recall, though, that the notion of differential operators you're recalling from Hamilton doesn't strictly apply here because it actually defines linear differential operators. A way to see the pullback as a differential operator is to see the pullbacks of $\wedge^n T^∗\! M$ by all $f\in\text{Diff}(M)$ as sub-bundles of the (fiber) bundle $\tilde{\pi}:M\times\wedge^n T^*\! M\rightarrow M$, the bundle projection being $(p,q)\mapsto \tilde{\pi}(p,q)=p$. | |
Dec 10 at 21:13 | comment | added | Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro | You must consider the pullback $f^∗\omega$ of $\omega\in\Omega^n(M)=\Gamma(\wedge^n T^*\! M)$ as a smooth section of the pullback vector bundle $f^*\wedge^n T^*\! M$ (the identification being through the graph of $f^*\omega$ as usual). Once you do that, the pullback map $\omega\mapsto f^*\omega$ becomes a proper differential operator (mapping smooth sections of $\wedge^n T^*\! M$ to smooth sections of $f^*\wedge^n T^*\! M$). | |
Dec 10 at 13:48 | comment | added | Jan Heck | @DeaneYang Thank you for your answer. This was also my first intuition. However, I got stuck on a technical detail namely that for $p\in M$ $(f^∗w)_p$ depends on $w_{f(p)}$ and not $w_p$ in other words it does not map fibers to fibers which I believe it should to define a differential operator in Hamilton's sense since Hamilton defines differential operators of degree r as compositions of vector bundle operators and the map that maps a section to its $r$ -jet. | |
Dec 10 at 13:07 | comment | added | Deane Yang | This map is a nonlinear differential operator. You can see this by writing it in local coordinates. Any nonlinear differential operator is smooth tame. | |
Dec 10 at 13:02 | history | edited | Jan Heck | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Dec 10 at 12:46 | history | edited | Jan Heck |
edited tags
|
|
S Dec 10 at 12:35 | review | First questions | |||
Dec 10 at 13:29 | |||||
S Dec 10 at 12:35 | history | asked | Jan Heck | CC BY-SA 4.0 |