Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 10 at 2:04 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Links to comment and answer
Dec 9 at 20:51 history edited Matthew Kvalheim CC BY-SA 4.0
Made edit explanation more prominent
Dec 9 at 20:42 history edited Matthew Kvalheim CC BY-SA 4.0
Corrected link
Dec 9 at 16:00 vote accept Matthew Kvalheim
Dec 9 at 4:02 history became hot network question
Dec 9 at 0:22 answer added alesia timeline score: 6
Dec 8 at 23:11 comment added Ryan Budney Thanks, I erased my most recent comment as your edits made them irrellevant.
Dec 8 at 23:09 comment added Matthew Kvalheim @RyanBudney sorry, I see now that the original wording of my question’s second paragraph was unclear. I edited it and hope it’s clearer now.
Dec 8 at 23:07 history edited Matthew Kvalheim CC BY-SA 4.0
added 108 characters in body
Dec 8 at 20:48 comment added Matthew Kvalheim @MoisheKohan I had started to do so, but have not yet made much progress.
Dec 8 at 20:39 comment added Moishe Kohan Did you check if Ferry's arguments from his 1979 AJM paper on $\epsilon$-homeomorphisms apply in your situation? (There is no formal application, of course.)
Dec 8 at 20:20 history edited Matthew Kvalheim CC BY-SA 4.0
added 4 characters in body
Dec 8 at 20:17 comment added Matthew Kvalheim @RyanBudney and no, I do not think I am asking about an isotopy class of an embedding. In my question, it is not allowed for there to exist any embeddings at all of $M$ into $N$.
Dec 8 at 20:15 comment added Matthew Kvalheim @RyanBudney The Riemannian metric on $M$ induces a distance function, with respect to which we can define the diameter of an arbitrary subset. I am asking whether there exist $M$, $N$ such that $M$ does not embed in $N$ but there exists a sequence of continuous maps $f_k : M\to N$ such that $\sup_{n\in N} \text{diam} f_k^{-1}(n) \to 0$ as $k\to \infty$. For example, by an argument using top degree homology, this situation cannot occur if $N$ is an open manifold and $M$ is not. I think my question is related to 1979 work of Chapman and Ferry, but I do not see how to answer my question.
Dec 8 at 18:36 comment added Ryan Budney If the fibers aren't points or empty, what does it mean for the fibers to be arbitrarily small? I mean, if they're not empty they have some fixed diameter and you wouldn't be able to make $\epsilon$ smaller than that. Are you talking about in an isotopy class of an embedding?
Dec 8 at 16:45 history edited Matthew Kvalheim CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
Dec 8 at 16:16 history asked Matthew Kvalheim CC BY-SA 4.0