Timeline for Singular behavior of zeros of incomplete zeta function
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 days ago | comment | added | Zhobbyist | Fair catch. $C_k$ does depend on $s_0$ and the relation is only valid in the $s$ neighborhood of $s_0$. I've edited the question to make that clear. | |
| 2 days ago | history | edited | Zhobbyist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 65 characters in body
|
| 2 days ago | comment | added | Stopple | You displayed equation is not precise enough to say anything. The left side depends on $k$, the right does not (or only implicitly $C=C_k$). The right side depends on $s_0$, the left does not. What happens if $s_0$ is replaced with another zeta zero $s_0^\prime$? How can the left be $\approx$ both? | |
| Dec 8 at 12:58 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| S Dec 8 at 6:50 | review | First questions | |||
| Dec 8 at 7:31 | |||||
| S Dec 8 at 6:50 | history | asked | Zhobbyist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |