Skip to main content
replaced "abstraction scheme" with "separation scheme"; added 12 characters in body
Source Link
Ewan Delanoy
  • 3.6k
  • 26
  • 36

Hello all, one may look for "minimal system of axioms" for ZFC (or any other theory) in the following (unusual) sense : say that a subset S of ZFC is "sufficient" if there is an explicit procedure that constructs a model of ZFC from any model of S.

Thus, for example, ZF is sufficient since inside ZF we can construct Godel's universe L which is a model for ZFC. My questions : are minimal sufficient subsets of ZFC known? Is extensionality+infinity+(abstractionpower set)+(separation scheme) sufficient?

Hello all, one may look for "minimal system of axioms" for ZFC (or any other theory) in the following (unusual) sense : say that a subset S of ZFC is "sufficient" if there is an explicit procedure that constructs a model of ZFC from any model of S.

Thus, for example, ZF is sufficient since inside ZF we can construct Godel's universe L which is a model for ZFC. My questions : are minimal sufficient subsets of ZFC known? Is extensionality+infinity+(abstraction scheme) sufficient?

Hello all, one may look for "minimal system of axioms" for ZFC (or any other theory) in the following (unusual) sense : say that a subset S of ZFC is "sufficient" if there is an explicit procedure that constructs a model of ZFC from any model of S.

Thus, for example, ZF is sufficient since inside ZF we can construct Godel's universe L which is a model for ZFC. My questions : are minimal sufficient subsets of ZFC known? Is extensionality+infinity+(power set)+(separation scheme) sufficient?

corrected and reformulated the question
Source Link
Ewan Delanoy
  • 3.6k
  • 26
  • 36

Minimal subset of axioms for ZFC  

Hello all, one may look for "minimal system of axioms" for ZFC (or any other theory) in the following (unusual) sense : say that a subset S of ZFC is "sufficient" if it can be proved from S that there is an explicit procedure that constructs a model (V',R) of ZFC, where $V'$ is a set and R is a binary relation on $V'$ which need not be the usual $\in$ relation from any model of S.

Thus, for example, ZF is sufficient since inside ZF we can construct Godel's universe L which is a model for ZFC. My questions : are minimal sufficient subsets of ZFC known? Is extensionality+infinity+(abstraction scheme) sufficient?

Minimal subset of axioms for ZFC  

Hello all, one may look for "minimal system of axioms" for ZFC (or any other theory) in the following (unusual) sense : say that a subset S of ZFC is "sufficient" if it can be proved from S that there is a model (V',R) of ZFC, where $V'$ is a set and R is a binary relation on $V'$ which need not be the usual $\in$ relation.

Thus, for example, ZF is sufficient since inside ZF we can construct Godel's universe L which is a model for ZFC. My questions : are minimal sufficient subsets of ZFC known? Is extensionality+infinity+(abstraction scheme) sufficient?

Minimal subset of axioms for ZFC

Hello all, one may look for "minimal system of axioms" for ZFC (or any other theory) in the following (unusual) sense : say that a subset S of ZFC is "sufficient" if there is an explicit procedure that constructs a model of ZFC from any model of S.

Thus, for example, ZF is sufficient since inside ZF we can construct Godel's universe L which is a model for ZFC. My questions : are minimal sufficient subsets of ZFC known? Is extensionality+infinity+(abstraction scheme) sufficient?

Source Link
Ewan Delanoy
  • 3.6k
  • 26
  • 36

Minimal subset of axioms for ZFC

Hello all, one may look for "minimal system of axioms" for ZFC (or any other theory) in the following (unusual) sense : say that a subset S of ZFC is "sufficient" if it can be proved from S that there is a model (V',R) of ZFC, where $V'$ is a set and R is a binary relation on $V'$ which need not be the usual $\in$ relation.

Thus, for example, ZF is sufficient since inside ZF we can construct Godel's universe L which is a model for ZFC. My questions : are minimal sufficient subsets of ZFC known? Is extensionality+infinity+(abstraction scheme) sufficient?