Timeline for The history of Riemann-Roch theorem [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2 at 17:16 | history | closed |
Federico Poloni Andy Putman Daniele Tampieri Dan Turetsky Bugs Bunny |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Dec 1 at 1:04 | comment | added | J. W. Tanner | Cf. this question | |
| Nov 30 at 10:49 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 2 at 17:16 | |||||
| Nov 30 at 9:40 | comment | added | user1274233 | @DavidLehavi Hello, thank you for your comment. I will read the article you mentioned. | |
| Nov 30 at 9:06 | comment | added | David Lehavi | Mathematicians are usually horrible historians of math, so please take it with a grain of salt. According to "The Riemann-Roch Theorem and Geometry, 1854-1914" by gray ( sites.math.rutgers.edu/~tunnell/courses/574/574-S19/Gray.pdf ) it seems that the answer is negative. | |
| Nov 30 at 6:49 | history | edited | user1274233 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1445 characters in body
|
| Nov 30 at 2:21 | history | asked | user1274233 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |