Skip to main content
replaced http://tea.mathoverflow.net/ with http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Source Link

How's this:

Take the times $t_{pre}$ to be of the form $t_{pre} = T_{0} + iT$, where $i$ ranges over some set of integers of the form $\{0, 1, 2, . . . , N\}$, and we allow the possibility that $N$ is infinite and place no restriction on the sign of $T$, the interval size, though we take $T \ne\ 0$; since the case $T = 0$ boils down to there being only one value of $t_{pre}$, $T_{0}$, in which case $V(t)$ trivially becomes $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t - T_{0})/\tau}$. (I'm dropping your subscripts to $\tau$ for convenience, i.e. to make typing slightly easier.) Then in general we have $V(t) = \sum_{i = 0}^{N}(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0} - iT)/\tau}$; factoring out $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$ yields $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}\sum_{i = 0}^{N}e^{iT/\tau}$; in this form, $V(t)$ is a single exponential times a constant, as per your request. The sum can be cleaned up using standard formulae for geometric series (cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series), viz $\sum_{i = 0}^{N}e^{iT/\tau} = ((1 - e^{(N + 1)T/\tau})/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$, so finally $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}((1 - e^{(N + 1)T/\tau})/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$. In the event $T > 0$, the sum diverges unless $N$ is finite; for $T < 0$, however, letting $N \to \infty$ we obtain $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}(1/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$ or $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)(1/(1- e^{T/\tau}))e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$.

It is interesting to note that, as $T < 0$ becomes smaller in magnitude, i.e. $T \to 0^{-}$, $V(t)$ explodes, as if it were the sum of an infinite number of identical terms $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$; I leave a similar analysis when $T > 0$ to you.

I think you will find this stuff is generally covered under Laplace transforms, rather than Fourier series.

To the boys at http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/784/question-being-bumped-to-the-front-page/http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/784/question-being-bumped-to-the-front-page/: I did it again! Accidentally hit "Save" instead of "Preview"! Only lasted an hour this time. Whew! Gotta be more careful with those buttons!

How's this:

Take the times $t_{pre}$ to be of the form $t_{pre} = T_{0} + iT$, where $i$ ranges over some set of integers of the form $\{0, 1, 2, . . . , N\}$, and we allow the possibility that $N$ is infinite and place no restriction on the sign of $T$, the interval size, though we take $T \ne\ 0$; since the case $T = 0$ boils down to there being only one value of $t_{pre}$, $T_{0}$, in which case $V(t)$ trivially becomes $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t - T_{0})/\tau}$. (I'm dropping your subscripts to $\tau$ for convenience, i.e. to make typing slightly easier.) Then in general we have $V(t) = \sum_{i = 0}^{N}(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0} - iT)/\tau}$; factoring out $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$ yields $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}\sum_{i = 0}^{N}e^{iT/\tau}$; in this form, $V(t)$ is a single exponential times a constant, as per your request. The sum can be cleaned up using standard formulae for geometric series (cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series), viz $\sum_{i = 0}^{N}e^{iT/\tau} = ((1 - e^{(N + 1)T/\tau})/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$, so finally $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}((1 - e^{(N + 1)T/\tau})/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$. In the event $T > 0$, the sum diverges unless $N$ is finite; for $T < 0$, however, letting $N \to \infty$ we obtain $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}(1/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$ or $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)(1/(1- e^{T/\tau}))e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$.

It is interesting to note that, as $T < 0$ becomes smaller in magnitude, i.e. $T \to 0^{-}$, $V(t)$ explodes, as if it were the sum of an infinite number of identical terms $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$; I leave a similar analysis when $T > 0$ to you.

I think you will find this stuff is generally covered under Laplace transforms, rather than Fourier series.

To the boys at http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/784/question-being-bumped-to-the-front-page/: I did it again! Accidentally hit "Save" instead of "Preview"! Only lasted an hour this time. Whew! Gotta be more careful with those buttons!

How's this:

Take the times $t_{pre}$ to be of the form $t_{pre} = T_{0} + iT$, where $i$ ranges over some set of integers of the form $\{0, 1, 2, . . . , N\}$, and we allow the possibility that $N$ is infinite and place no restriction on the sign of $T$, the interval size, though we take $T \ne\ 0$; since the case $T = 0$ boils down to there being only one value of $t_{pre}$, $T_{0}$, in which case $V(t)$ trivially becomes $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t - T_{0})/\tau}$. (I'm dropping your subscripts to $\tau$ for convenience, i.e. to make typing slightly easier.) Then in general we have $V(t) = \sum_{i = 0}^{N}(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0} - iT)/\tau}$; factoring out $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$ yields $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}\sum_{i = 0}^{N}e^{iT/\tau}$; in this form, $V(t)$ is a single exponential times a constant, as per your request. The sum can be cleaned up using standard formulae for geometric series (cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series), viz $\sum_{i = 0}^{N}e^{iT/\tau} = ((1 - e^{(N + 1)T/\tau})/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$, so finally $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}((1 - e^{(N + 1)T/\tau})/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$. In the event $T > 0$, the sum diverges unless $N$ is finite; for $T < 0$, however, letting $N \to \infty$ we obtain $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}(1/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$ or $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)(1/(1- e^{T/\tau}))e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$.

It is interesting to note that, as $T < 0$ becomes smaller in magnitude, i.e. $T \to 0^{-}$, $V(t)$ explodes, as if it were the sum of an infinite number of identical terms $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$; I leave a similar analysis when $T > 0$ to you.

I think you will find this stuff is generally covered under Laplace transforms, rather than Fourier series.

To the boys at http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/784/question-being-bumped-to-the-front-page/: I did it again! Accidentally hit "Save" instead of "Preview"! Only lasted an hour this time. Whew! Gotta be more careful with those buttons!

Post Undeleted by drbobmeister
added 1420 characters in body
Source Link
drbobmeister
  • 391
  • 3
  • 6
  • 13

How's this:

Take the times $t_{pre}$ to be of the form $t_{pre} = T_{0} + iT$, where $i$ ranges over some set of integers of the form $\{0, 1, 2, . . . , N\}$, and we allow the possibility that $N$ is infinite and place no restriction on the sign of $T$, the interval size, though we take $T \ne\ 0$; since the case $T = 0$ boils down to there being only one value of $t_{pre}$, $T_{0}$, in which case $V(t)$ trivially becomes $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{(t - T_{0})/\tau}$$(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t - T_{0})/\tau}$. (I'm dropping your subscripts to $\tau$ for convenience, i.e. to make typing slightly easier.) Then in general we have %V(t) = \sum_{i = 0}^{N}(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{$V(t) = \sum_{i = 0}^{N}(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0} - iT)/\tau}$; factoring out $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$ yields $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}\sum_{i = 0}^{N}e^{iT/\tau}$; in this form, $V(t)$ is a single exponential times a constant, as per your request. The sum can be cleaned up using standard formulae for geometric series (t-T_{0}cf. - iThttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series)/\tau}$, viz $\sum_{i = 0}^{N}e^{iT/\tau} = ((1 - e^{(N + 1)T/\tau})/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$, so finally $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}((1 - e^{(N + 1)T/\tau})/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$. In the event $T > 0$, the sum diverges unless $N$ is finite; for $T < 0$, however, letting $N \to \infty$ we obtain $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}(1/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$ or $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)(1/(1- e^{T/\tau}))e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$.

It is interesting to note that, as $T < 0$ becomes smaller in magnitude, i.e. $T \to 0^{-}$, $V(t)$ explodes, as if it were the sum of an infinite number of identical terms $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$; I leave a similar analysis when $T > 0$ to you.

I think you will find this stuff is generally covered under Laplace transforms, rather than Fourier series.

To the boys at http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/784/question-being-bumped-to-the-front-page/: I did it again! Accidentally hit "Save" instead of "Preview"! Only lasted an hour this time. Whew! Gotta be more careful with those buttons!

How's this:

Take the times $t_{pre}$ to be of the form $t_{pre} = T_{0} + iT$, where $i$ ranges over some set of integers of the form $\{0, 1, 2, . . . , N\}$, and we allow the possibility that $N$ is infinite and place no restriction on the sign of $T$, the interval size, though we take $T \ne\ 0$; since the case $T = 0$ boils down to there being only one value of $t_{pre}$, $T_{0}$, in which case $V(t)$ trivially becomes $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{(t - T_{0})/\tau}$. (I'm dropping your subscripts to $\tau$ for convenience, i.e. to make typing slightly easier. Then in general we have %V(t) = \sum_{i = 0}^{N}(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{(t-T_{0} - iT)/\tau}$

How's this:

Take the times $t_{pre}$ to be of the form $t_{pre} = T_{0} + iT$, where $i$ ranges over some set of integers of the form $\{0, 1, 2, . . . , N\}$, and we allow the possibility that $N$ is infinite and place no restriction on the sign of $T$, the interval size, though we take $T \ne\ 0$; since the case $T = 0$ boils down to there being only one value of $t_{pre}$, $T_{0}$, in which case $V(t)$ trivially becomes $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t - T_{0})/\tau}$. (I'm dropping your subscripts to $\tau$ for convenience, i.e. to make typing slightly easier.) Then in general we have $V(t) = \sum_{i = 0}^{N}(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0} - iT)/\tau}$; factoring out $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$ yields $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}\sum_{i = 0}^{N}e^{iT/\tau}$; in this form, $V(t)$ is a single exponential times a constant, as per your request. The sum can be cleaned up using standard formulae for geometric series (cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series), viz $\sum_{i = 0}^{N}e^{iT/\tau} = ((1 - e^{(N + 1)T/\tau})/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$, so finally $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}((1 - e^{(N + 1)T/\tau})/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$. In the event $T > 0$, the sum diverges unless $N$ is finite; for $T < 0$, however, letting $N \to \infty$ we obtain $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}(1/(1- e^{T/\tau}))$ or $V(t) = (\epsilon_{0}/\tau)(1/(1- e^{T/\tau}))e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$.

It is interesting to note that, as $T < 0$ becomes smaller in magnitude, i.e. $T \to 0^{-}$, $V(t)$ explodes, as if it were the sum of an infinite number of identical terms $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{-(t-T_{0})/\tau}$; I leave a similar analysis when $T > 0$ to you.

I think you will find this stuff is generally covered under Laplace transforms, rather than Fourier series.

To the boys at http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/784/question-being-bumped-to-the-front-page/: I did it again! Accidentally hit "Save" instead of "Preview"! Only lasted an hour this time. Whew! Gotta be more careful with those buttons!

Post Deleted by drbobmeister
Source Link
drbobmeister
  • 391
  • 3
  • 6
  • 13

How's this:

Take the times $t_{pre}$ to be of the form $t_{pre} = T_{0} + iT$, where $i$ ranges over some set of integers of the form $\{0, 1, 2, . . . , N\}$, and we allow the possibility that $N$ is infinite and place no restriction on the sign of $T$, the interval size, though we take $T \ne\ 0$; since the case $T = 0$ boils down to there being only one value of $t_{pre}$, $T_{0}$, in which case $V(t)$ trivially becomes $(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{(t - T_{0})/\tau}$. (I'm dropping your subscripts to $\tau$ for convenience, i.e. to make typing slightly easier. Then in general we have %V(t) = \sum_{i = 0}^{N}(\epsilon_{0}/\tau)e^{(t-T_{0} - iT)/\tau}$