Skip to main content
Title of paper; DOI'd link
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

In the paper linked below, S. A. Antonyan gives the following proposition without proof (in fact all results are given without proof). I need a proof of this theorem. If anyone has information on this subject, can you comment?

Propoition 7: A $G$-space is compact if and only if it is simultaneously $G$-pseudocompact (it is equivalent $\beta _{G}X=\beta X$, as mentioned in the article) and $G$-Hewitt.

https://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=rm&paperid=3884&option_lang=eng$G$-pseudocompact and $G$-Hewitt spaces

In the paper linked below, S. A. Antonyan gives the following proposition without proof (in fact all results are given without proof). I need a proof of this theorem. If anyone has information on this subject, can you comment?

Propoition 7: A $G$-space is compact if and only if it is simultaneously $G$-pseudocompact (it is equivalent $\beta _{G}X=\beta X$, as mentioned in the article) and $G$-Hewitt.

https://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=rm&paperid=3884&option_lang=eng

In the paper linked below, S. A. Antonyan gives the following proposition without proof (in fact all results are given without proof). I need a proof of this theorem. If anyone has information on this subject, can you comment?

Propoition 7: A $G$-space is compact if and only if it is simultaneously $G$-pseudocompact (it is equivalent $\beta _{G}X=\beta X$, as mentioned in the article) and $G$-Hewitt.

$G$-pseudocompact and $G$-Hewitt spaces

added 14 characters in body
Source Link
Mehmet Onat
  • 1.4k
  • 7
  • 12

In the paper linked below, S. A. Antonyan gives the following proposition without proof (in fact all results are given without proof). I need a proof of this theorem. If anyone has information on this subject, can you comment?

Propoition 7: A $G$-space is compact if and only if it is simultaneously $G$-pseudocompact (it is equivalent $\beta _{G}X=\beta X$, as mentioned in the article) and $G$-Hewitt.

https://www.mathnet.ru/links/d0ee09e8187cd069c75378b50ea4f597/rm3884_eng.pdfhttps://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=rm&paperid=3884&option_lang=eng

In the paper linked below, S. A. Antonyan gives the following proposition without proof (in fact all results are given without proof). I need a proof of this theorem. If anyone has information on this subject, can you comment?

Propoition 7: A $G$-space is compact if and only if it is simultaneously $G$-pseudocompact (it is equivalent $\beta _{G}X=\beta X$, as mentioned in the article) and $G$-Hewitt.

https://www.mathnet.ru/links/d0ee09e8187cd069c75378b50ea4f597/rm3884_eng.pdf

In the paper linked below, S. A. Antonyan gives the following proposition without proof (in fact all results are given without proof). I need a proof of this theorem. If anyone has information on this subject, can you comment?

Propoition 7: A $G$-space is compact if and only if it is simultaneously $G$-pseudocompact (it is equivalent $\beta _{G}X=\beta X$, as mentioned in the article) and $G$-Hewitt.

https://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=rm&paperid=3884&option_lang=eng

Source Link
Mehmet Onat
  • 1.4k
  • 7
  • 12

A question about G-Hewitt spaces

In the paper linked below, S. A. Antonyan gives the following proposition without proof (in fact all results are given without proof). I need a proof of this theorem. If anyone has information on this subject, can you comment?

Propoition 7: A $G$-space is compact if and only if it is simultaneously $G$-pseudocompact (it is equivalent $\beta _{G}X=\beta X$, as mentioned in the article) and $G$-Hewitt.

https://www.mathnet.ru/links/d0ee09e8187cd069c75378b50ea4f597/rm3884_eng.pdf