Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 25 at 17:02 comment added Mark Grant @ConnorMalin: Thanks. I was able to work that out from the context. But it obviously is not the first category that comes to mind when thinking about equivariant homotopy theory.
Nov 23 at 15:28 comment added Connor Malin @MarkGrant If it wasn't clear, I was writing in the homotopy category of Borel G-spaces, i.e. G-spaces where we invert G-equivariant maps which are underlying weak equivalences.
Nov 23 at 15:08 comment added Mark Grant This is a nice answer, but I found it a bit confusing since the point $*$ is not $G$-homotopy equivalent to $EG$. Would it not be better to say "provides an equivariant splitting of the classifying map $X\to EG$"?
Nov 23 at 14:13 vote accept Nicolas Guès
Nov 23 at 14:13 comment added Nicolas Guès Great answer, thank you!
Nov 23 at 8:44 comment added Connor Malin @R.vanDobbendeBruyn Functors preserve retractions, and so if a complex $X$ retracts onto a point in the homotopy category of $G$-spaces, it implies that $H_\ast (X_{hG})$ retracts onto $H_\ast(\ast_{hG})=H_\ast(BG)$. That implies that $H_\ast (X_{hG})$ is nonzero in all the degrees $H_\ast(BG)$ is. If the action of $G$ on $X$ is free and nice enough at the pointset level, then $X_{hG}\simeq X_G$. If $X$ is finite dimensional, this implies $H_\ast(X_{hG})$ is bounded, so if $H_\ast(BG)$ is unbounded such a map cannot exist.
Nov 22 at 22:27 comment added R. van Dobben de Bruyn Could you maybe include a little more detail about what the actual obstruction is? It's not clear to me why unboundedness prevents this map from having a section.
Nov 22 at 19:58 comment added Chris Schommer-Pries that is a nice argument!
Nov 22 at 18:13 history answered Connor Malin CC BY-SA 4.0