Timeline for Weakly compact cardinals in $L$: how long do branches take to appear?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12 at 1:57 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | @JoelDavidHamkins Hang on ... :P | |
| Nov 12 at 0:39 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | I haven't heard that, but it makes sense, in light of arguments I've heard from Philip. | |
| Nov 12 at 0:31 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | This is great! (I've heard this called a "Welch-style characterization," incidentally, if I'm not misusing the term; @JoelDavidHamkins?) | |
| Nov 12 at 0:30 | vote | accept | Noah Schweber | ||
| Nov 12 at 0:17 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | And this argument has an affinity with the argument in my result with Enayat, where a similar underlying order is used. | |
| Nov 12 at 0:14 | history | edited | Farmer S | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 607 characters in body
|
| Nov 12 at 0:04 | history | answered | Farmer S | CC BY-SA 4.0 |