Timeline for Trace type convergence of the Laplacian on the box to the Laplacian on $\mathbb R^d$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Nov 17 at 23:00 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Nov 17 at 23:00 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Nov 9 at 21:37 | history | bounty started | lasik43 | ||
| S Nov 9 at 21:37 | history | notice added | lasik43 | Draw attention | |
| Nov 8 at 10:21 | history | edited | lasik43 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 33 characters in body
|
| Nov 8 at 10:20 | comment | added | lasik43 | @ChristianRemling If $h(x) = x$, then the RHS operator is trace class, see e.g. Barry Simon: Trace ideals, Theorem 4.5. For general $h$, I think we might need continuously differentiable (and obviously $h(0) = 0$); I updated the question. | |
| Nov 7 at 22:41 | comment | added | Christian Remling | Is it even clear that the operator on the RHS (for $h(x)=x$) is compact? | |
| Nov 7 at 19:39 | history | edited | lasik43 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 68 characters in body
|
| S Nov 7 at 19:30 | review | First questions | |||
| Nov 7 at 20:21 | |||||
| S Nov 7 at 19:30 | history | asked | lasik43 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |