Timeline for Does the fundamental equality control finiteness?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jul 4, 2017 at 0:00 | history | suggested | jeq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Replaced backslash-squarebracket with squarebracket, ten times, to fix rendering.
|
| Jul 3, 2017 at 23:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 4, 2017 at 0:00 | |||||
| Dec 3, 2010 at 16:42 | comment | added | user565739 | To Basti, I have mentioned that I have to assume $B$ is integrally closed. But we don't have to restrict to this case. Even if $B$ is not integrally closed (Hence not a Dedekind domain), we can still define the inetia degree and ramification index (as the length of some module as I mentioned). | |
| Dec 3, 2010 at 13:36 | comment | added | Sebastian Petersen | But: cool question! | |
| Dec 3, 2010 at 13:36 | comment | added | Sebastian Petersen | In line 3: I do not think that $B$ is automatically a Dedekind domain. Maybe you should assume that $B$ is is integrally closed right from the beginning... | |
| Dec 2, 2010 at 22:03 | history | edited | user565739 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 146 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 21:15 | history | edited | Charles Matthews | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
grammar
|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 19:20 | history | asked | user565739 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |