Skip to main content

Timeline for existence of a coherent sheaf

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 19 at 5:05 vote accept KAK
Oct 19 at 5:04 vote accept KAK
Oct 19 at 5:05
Oct 18 at 3:02 history edited KAK CC BY-SA 4.0
added 12 characters in body
Oct 18 at 3:02 answer added KAK timeline score: 2
Oct 17 at 11:00 comment added KAK @Z.M Ok got it .Thank you
Oct 17 at 10:50 comment added Z. M I mean, any finitely projective projective module equipped with a surjection. This is how one produces projective resolutions, but since the module in question is coherent, you can pick finitely generated projective resolutions.
Oct 17 at 10:46 comment added KAK @Z.M Can you please tell how to get the surjection $p$?
Oct 17 at 10:18 comment added Z. M When the ring $A[t^\pm]$ is coherent, you can pick any finite projective $A[t^\pm]$-module (which is coherent, by coherence of $A[t^\pm]$) along with a surjection $p$ to $\mathcal F(X)$, and the coherence of $A[t^\pm]$ guarantees that the $A[t^\pm]$-module $\ker p$, a priori of finite type, is also coherent.
Oct 17 at 10:02 comment added KAK @Z.M If A is Noetherian ring Then which resolution i need to use?
Oct 17 at 9:52 comment added Z. M As you have already observed, the scheme $X=\operatorname{Spec}(A[t^\pm])$ is affine, so you can just formulate it as a problem of modules. However, I am not sure what assumptions you have on $A$. If $A$ is stably coherent (e.g. a Noetherian ring, or a valuation ring), then this simply follows from existence of flat resolutions.
Oct 17 at 5:40 review Close votes
Oct 22 at 3:09
Oct 17 at 5:31 comment added KAK @Sasha Sorry for the bad mistake. I have edited my question
Oct 17 at 5:30 history edited KAK CC BY-SA 4.0
added 33 characters in body
Oct 17 at 5:22 comment added Sasha In fact $\mathrm{Tor}_1^{\mathcal{O}_X}(G,\mathcal{O}_X) = 0$ for any quasicoherent sheaf $G$, because $\mathcal{O}_X$ is $\mathcal{O}_X$-flat.
Oct 17 at 5:03 history asked KAK CC BY-SA 4.0